Do We Need a New Internet? - NYTimes.com This sure looks like the way we're going. Two nets: one anonymous and dangerous, the other heavily authenticated and a lot less entertaining.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(130)
-
▼
February
(33)
- European law enforcement ups the pressure on Skype
- Esther Olavarria takes (new) DAS job for immigrati...
- Visa Waiver Worries
- Vast new amounts of "public" data could become act...
- Talk about mixed feelings
- Lily Allen's latest album
- Whining about Scribefire
- How Sri Lanka Put Terrorism on the Ropes
- Eerie silence over Chandra Levy case
- More on the Chicago 911 camera links
- Switzerland complains about disclosure of tax chea...
- Goverrnment is hard
- A glimpse of the future?
- What it takes to make surveillance cameras work
- Challenging European Consensus
- This just in -- Harris Interactive destroyed by li...
- Crowd-sourcing Intrusion Detection
- The War on the War on Terror
- It makes a UCLA grad proud (if a bit surprised) ...
- Good news: Poop that smells like mint. Bad news:...
- Trouble brewing for DHS on northern border?
- Immigration ain't what it used to be
- You'd think the NYT would be torn about this idea
- An American Foreign Legion?
- Terrorism meets chick lit
- Canadian federal government falls victim to Patrio...
- Plus, it's more fun to administer than a shot ...
- More thoughts on a secure Internet
- More worries about the future of Mexico
- And this is just cool: a way to knock off several...
- NYT asks whether security problems will force us t...
- Rep. Norm Dicks objects to border enforcement in W...
- E-Verify Trashed in Stimulus
-
▼
February
(33)
No comments:
Post a Comment